A data request answered in days,
from every system at once
A GDPR data subject request, give me my data, or delete my data, sounds simple until someone has to actually find every place that person's information lives: the CRM, the support tickets, the analytics database, three different marketing tools. We build an agent that searches across every connected system, compiles the export or routes the deletion, and keeps a dated record proving the request was handled within the legal deadline.
The process today
A data subject request arrives, someone asking what data you hold on them or asking for it to be deleted, and answering it properly means searching every system that could plausibly hold information about that person: the CRM, the support ticketing system, the marketing email platform, the analytics warehouse, the backup snapshots, and whatever third-party processors you use for payments, shipping or customer communication. Doing that search by hand, system by system, person by person, is slow and easy to get incomplete, especially under the legal deadlines most privacy regulations impose.
The second cost is the deadline itself. GDPR requires a response within a set number of days, and a request that sits in a shared inbox for a week before anyone starts working on it eats into that window fast, especially once the actual search and compilation work begins.
The third is deletion specifically, which is harder than it sounds: data does not just live in the live database, it is in backups, in a third-party email tool’s own records, sometimes in a spreadsheet someone exported for a one-off analysis months ago. A deletion that only touches the obvious, primary system leaves a company exposed to a regulator finding the data still exists somewhere else.
What the agent does
When a data subject request comes in, the agent first verifies the requester’s identity against account details you already hold, with a manual review path for anything ambiguous, then searches every connected system for that person’s data: structured records in the CRM and database, support ticket history, marketing platform records, and data held by connected third-party processors where their API allows it. For an access request, it compiles the findings into a structured, readable export. For a deletion request, it routes the deletion to every system where the data was found, including backup systems where feasible, and flags clearly anywhere a legal retention requirement conflicts with full deletion, a financial record that must be kept for tax purposes, for example, so a person can decide how to handle that specific conflict.
Every request is tracked against its legal deadline from the moment it arrives, with escalation to a named person if a deadline is approaching and work is not yet complete. A confirmation log records exactly what was found, exported or deleted, and when, ready to show a regulator if a request is ever questioned later. Typical integrations: your CRM, support platform, marketing tools, analytics warehouse, and any third-party processor with a data API.
What stays with humans
Deciding how to resolve a conflict between a deletion request and a legal retention requirement is a compliance or legal decision, never something the agent resolves on its own; it surfaces the conflict clearly and waits for a decision. Identity verification that comes back ambiguous is reviewed by a person before any data is released. The final response sent to the requester, confirming what was done, is reviewed before it goes out, even though the underlying search and compilation work is automated.
Guards
Every request, what was searched, found, exported or deleted, and the identity verification result, is logged in full, building a record that satisfies most regulatory audit requirements. No data is released or deleted without the identity verification step completing first. A kill switch pauses automatic processing for any request that looks unusual, handing it entirely to a person, without affecting requests already in the normal, verified flow.
Price and timeline
| Option | Price | What it covers | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single automation | from $900 | Core customer-data systems, access and deletion request handling, deadline tracking | 1 to 2 weeks |
| Department package | from $2,400 | GDPR request handling plus log retention and compliance and access reviews | 2 to 4 weeks |
Running cost is usually $15 to $45 a month in model usage depending on request volume.
Related
This pairs well with log retention and compliance since both are part of the same regulatory record-keeping, and with access reviews and offboarding for the broader data governance picture. For the general compliance checklist side, see the existing compliance checklists automation. Full package details are on the AI agents service page and the automation-everything overview; for work on data handling in a privacy-sensitive product, see the secure messenger case study and the two-brand analytics hub case study.
Dreading the next data subject request landing in a shared inbox? Get in touch and we will map where your customer data actually lives.
Tired of doing this by hand? We can take the whole routine off your team, not just this step: Routine takeover, from $400 →
FAQ
How much does GDPR request automation cost?
From $900 covering your core customer-data systems, live in 1 to 2 weeks. A larger system footprint with multiple third-party processors usually runs $1,600 to $2,500.
Does the agent decide whether to honor a deletion request?
No, your legal or compliance lead decides, especially where a legal retention requirement conflicts with a deletion request, such as financial records that must be kept for tax purposes. The agent finds the data, flags any retention conflict, and executes what your team approves.
How does it verify the request is actually from the person it claims to be?
An identity verification step runs before any data is released or deleted, matching the request against account details you already hold, with a manual review path for anything ambiguous.
Does this cover backups, not just live databases?
Yes, deletion requests are routed to backup systems and third-party processors as well as live databases, which is where manual processes most often fall short.
Which regions does this apply to, only the EU?
The process is built around GDPR, but the same search-compile-delete mechanics apply to similar regimes like the UK's data protection law, Thailand's PDPA, or California's CCPA, with the specific legal deadlines and requirements adjusted per regulation.